The Problem
Tags superficially allow you to characterize customer calls to the contact center. For large client companies a more in-depth assessment and elaboration of statistics on the topics of appeals is needed.
Research
I interviewed loyal customers and analysts from customer teams, and it was very easy to figure out the pain points because they were pretty critical at this point.
<aside>
🚨 The pain points were:
- Every customer problem can't be one-sided.
- There can be the same customer problems, but stem from completely different corollaries.
- Every customer problem can have many levels of causes and interactions.
- Designers want to use analytics too, but the existing tools are complicated.
</aside>
Competitors
Competitors' products are complex systems, they are not easy to use, but some of our customers and potential customers interacted with the patterns in the old systems, so I decided to take into account all aspects of this functionality. I analysed competitors to figure out their best solutions to get as many product ideas as possible.

Product Ideas
The main product ideas I had were:
- Make the product as simple as possible (because I wanted everyone on the team to be able to use it).
- Despite the fact that each theme can have many levels of nesting, I have to make each element readable, which if you add highlighting elements, and if you highlight the parent element, all of its children will also have highlighting.
- it should look nice and modern. I took into account the practices of modern, convenient services for working with trees.
- The product already has a tag section, but what if you improve it and add trees. How would this affect the user experience?
- To divide topics into folders-groups. Because one way or another, every problem has a root.
First hypothesis
Extend the tagging capabilities (Tagging section) by adding nesting levels (mother-son tags).